originally published on CounterPunch
As Easter Sunday melds into Easter Monday, and as technophiles and
other overly zealous techno-fetishists prattle on about their
market-based (that is, their faith-based) and tech-based fixes for
climate change, a foolproof, low-tech and (dare I say) “shovel ready”
solution is already at hand: the time-honored institution of the
vacation. Recognized as vital at least since biblical times (when the
sabbath – a word derived from the verb ‘to rest’ – was introduced) the
vacation not only enables people and other animals to rejuvenate, the
planet itself benefits from being left alone.
To be sure, people the world over have for millennia recognized that
leaving fields fallow (or at least rotating crops) allows fields to
recover their vitality. And who can deny the fact that limiting the
introduction of pollutants to the ground helps the earth to repair
itself? The soil, people, and other animals, though, are not the only
things that benefit from rest; the seas, also, heal when left alone.
Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, for example, North Sea
fisheries were over-fished to such an extent that, by the 1930s, they
were all but depleted. The vacation imposed by World War II, however
(which virtually shut down the industry for the war’s duration), allowed
fish populations to recover. On the brink of deforming into a worldwide
dead zone today, a global moratorium on – and mandatory vacation from –
industrial fishing (not to mention a vacation from the introduction of
various toxic pollutants into the seas) could not only lead to the
recovery of the world’s oceans, because the oceans are responsible for
converting most of the world’s CO2 into oxygen, such a policy could
significantly mitigate climate change as well.
In addition to the seas and the soil and the people of the world, the
planet’s skies would also greatly benefit from a meaningful vacation.
As demonstrated by the cessation of air travel following the eruption of
the Eyjafjallajokull volcano in Iceland in 2010 (not to mention shut
downs and slow downs from labor strikes, and the limitation of
automobile traffic, among other things), vacations from our ecocidal
economy lead to vastly improved air quality. In other words, beyond
improving the soil, the air, the seas, and people’s health and quality
of life, vacations of various stripes and types alleviate climate change
in general.
And while such improvements (to health, for instance) alone should
lead reasonable people to adopt something akin to a secular sabbath (two
or three mandatory holidays per week, perhaps), when we factor in what
we know about climate change, and the harms we collectively face, the
adoption of such a policy should amount to a socio-economic priority for
all but the most disturbed sadists and masochists among us – a
priority, by the way, with very few downsides. Indeed, while in earlier
times vacations may have compromised people’s health to some degree
(since vacations could impede the production of food, among other
necessities), vacations pose no such problems presently. Modern
agricultural practices enable the production of easily enough food to
feed the world – the demands of profit, more than anything else, are
what determine that millions of people should be deprived of sufficient
nutrition.
With the capitalist economic system’s voracious requirements in mind,
though, it takes little to recognize that ten, or so, extra vacations
per month will result in both 1) less income, and added harms, for
workers and 2) less profit for owners. Like the climate change problem,
however, this apparent problem has a simple, low tech solution: the
decommodification of housing, food, electricity, transportation, and
other “necessities” will correct problem 1). As for problem 2) – well,
the owners will just have to take a “haircut.” With economic inequality
at historic highs, there’s little question that they can afford it.
And though we should not overlook the fact that climate change is
merely part of a larger problem, stemming from a culture of domination
and alienation (from which capitalism itself is but an outgrowth), and
though we should note that, within such a context, a couple of vacations
a week can only amount to a short term fix, a couple of mandatory
vacations a week, and the decommodification of necessities, may
nevertheless not be a terrible place to begin.
Friday, August 29, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment